An Independent Journal of Ideas

Gauri Khanna

Who Gets to Speak for a Nation?

“Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”

Alfred Korzybski

At my school assembly this week, someone gave a speech about “what India stands for.” They talked about values, respect, peace, and culture. It was nice, but something kept bothering me.

Who decided those are the things we all stand for?

I don’t disagree with them. But it made me wonder: can a whole nation really stand for one thing? Or does someone just get the power to say what they think the nation should be?

And who gave them that power?

In history class, we learned about treaties and declarations. But behind every official statement, there are voices that weren’t included. Farmers didn’t sign most treaties. Neither did schoolchildren, shopkeepers, or street sweepers. But they are part of the country too.

Sometimes we hear that a nation wants something—“India wants development” or “France believes in liberty.” But countries don’t speak. People do. And even then, not all people get a microphone.

So when someone says “this is what our country believes,” I want to ask: whose voice are you using?

In democracies, we vote for representatives. But one vote doesn’t always feel like a voice. Especially when decisions are made far away, in rooms we’re not allowed into, by people we’ll never meet.

They say, “We speak for all of you,”
With suits and slogans neat and true.
But in the back, a child will ask,
“Who gave you that important task?”

A whisper lost, a vote ignored,
A mother’s cry, a worker floored—
The nation isn’t only pride.
It’s also those left outside.

The scariest part isn’t that people disagree. It’s that those who disagree are often treated as if they’re unpatriotic, or even dangerous. Like asking hard questions makes you less loyal. But shouldn’t real patriotism mean caring enough to question things?

Maybe a nation should be measured not by what it says at the United Nations, but by how well it listens to its quietest citizens.

If someone speaks for a country but ignores its people, are they really a leader? Or just a loud voice with a big flag?